Geek Prospectus 3.0  

Posted by Y in , ,



It's moving time!

When E and I started this thing, we were a humble little blog. Eventually, we outgrew little blog things, and had to move to a non-standard Blogger template. Well, we've outgrown that too!

Over the weekend, we'll be moving to our new site: www.geekprospectus.com.

So come monday, head on over to the new site. All that great Geek Prospectus content you've come to know and love will still be there, and in a fancy new format. We're still testing and trying things out, so expect some changes over the next few months, but we're all set and ready to go, and we hope you'll like it.

For you RSS subscribers, well, this is much less exciting for you, because there's no change. The feed will switch over automatically, so no need for you to do anything. Though you should take a second to look at the new site and see how you like it.

Thanks for supporting the website, everyone. We look forward to keeping you entertained while you are bored at work.

For the curious: We've imported all the old posts and comments to the new site, so everything will still be there. We're also pretty excited about the new site. It looks awesome, and will help us continue the illusion that we are actually good at this. Join the fun!

Draft: ACTION SEQUENCES! Round 2  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

In this round, we continue to pick the best action sequences from films.

1) Grimbil - Lobby scene from the Matrix. After forcing yourself through the 2nd and 3rd
installments, it's easy to forget just how ground breaking and amazing first
movie was. The scene of Neo running in slow motion with the stone columns
exploding under a hailstorm of gunfire is absolutely classic.

LD - I was going to pick this one at some point. The third act of the first
Matrix film was just amazing at the time. One of the best action sequences
ever. I don't know if I've ever been so excited during a movie. Luckily,
the following six hours of turgid dialogue and asinine symbolism disguised
as meandering plot have allowed me to sound rational when discussing it.

E - I saw the original Matrix THREE times in the theaters! That's how much of a
dork I was!
2) E - Casino Royale - opening chase scene
Parkour bad assedness that ends in the embassy with Bond facing down tons of
assault rifles. A joy to look at, ridiculous stunts on that crane, and Craig
being as Craig as he wants to be.

3) LD - B13 - Casino fight
I can't believe Bond is going to get drafted before B13. THIS is what an
awesome Parkour fight looks like. 20-foot long jumpkicks, men being thrown
through tables, just insane stunts and incredible sense of geography.

E - having only seen B13 once, I didn't feel like I could really pick it since I
barely remember anything specific about it other than it was just
awesomeness.

4) SN - Let's take it back a bit with the shopping mall sequence in True
Lies. First, there's the awesome shootout in the bathroom, with a bit
of humor in it as well. Then, Ah-nald follows the terrorist, who's on
a motorcycle, on horseback in an incredibly entertaining chase
sequence. For a second, you think he's actually going to jump from one
skyscraper to another on a horse. Wisely, he does not. In case you
haven't figured it out yet, awesome chase sequences give me a hard-on.

LD - Wow. What an obscure but awesome choice. That really is a fantastic
scene. Don't even get me started on the impossibly great SNES game.

5) N8 - The unfilmed Ewok genocide following the explosion of the Death Star
over the moon of Endor. No, just kidding. I want something a little more
interpersonal than some of the more recent picks. The action sequence
in *Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade* as Indy takes over the tank as they race they
Nazis through the dessert to the canyon of the crescent moon. Not only do
you have some of the great "shoot three guys at once" humor, but you also
have Indy being draged all over the tank treads before the groundswell of
Indy music bursts out and you get his triumphant ass-kicking, climaxing when
the tank goes over the edge. "Damn it, Saul, I said 'No camels! That's
four camels -- can't you count?'"

6) JC - Duel of the Fates - Episode 1.

OJ Comics: An homage to Bil Keane  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

Sorry the production of these masterworks has slowed. I intend to change that.

That's enough, Tilda Swinton  

Posted by Top Sella in

Are there any actors out there that you constantly hate? Not necessarily the actors themselves, but the characters they play, that is? For me, that actress is Tilda Swinton.



I know nothing about Tilda Swinton personally. I do know, however, that she often plays a bitch in movies. She was a cold bitch with no regard for human life in Michael Clayton. She was a cold bitch again in Burn After Reading. Then, in The Curious Case of Benjamin Button, she was kind of a cold bitch, having an affair with Button while staying married to her husband -- no doubt for the money, that gold-digging whore.


Then there's this -- her imdb profile lists several movies with German titles. "Now, where have I heard of Germany before?" you may be asking yourself. Well, they were the bad guys in World War II (there was also a World War I, but the history of who fought against who has been lost with the passage of time). So it's safe to assume that anyone acting in a German movie is herself a Nazi.

She's also in The Chronicles of Narnia movies, playing -- get this -- a witch. That seals it for me. I am disinclined to like you, Tilda Swinton.

Rom Com Roundup: Must Love Dogs [12 of 30]  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

must-love-dogs
[Rom Com Roundup is a project where I watch 30 romantic comedies I've never seen from now until valentine's day and document how it affects my outlook on love. (Link to the full list of movies)]

The Movie: Must Love Dogs

The Blurb: Two divorcees (WHO DON'T EVEN OWN DOGS) meet via an internet dating website with a WHOOOOOLE LOTTA BAGGAGE. And wouldn't ya know, they hit it off, but end up on bad terms due to a series of coincidences. Each go off the map and almost lose themselves, only to find each other again cuz they love each other. Oh, and John Cusack wears a trenchcoat through the whole movie. I mean, seriously, dude, isn't it time you ditched that look?

Conventions: Gay guy friends, Dr. Zhivago as a point of reference, strip club to ease the woes of a guy, dating montage! TWO OF THEM!

Current State of Mind: Y'know, if you put a dog and John Cusack in a movie, chances are I'm going to like it. And this movie had about oh, half an hour of charm to it. Too bad it crumbles into the ashes of its own absurdity. First, there's a family sing-a-long to the Partridge Family Theme, and I mean, that's charming. No, seriously, it was. And then there's the first date with the overly intense Cuscack talking about the universe, and all that. And then, things go ahhh kerfluffle, and lo and behold, this movie turns into some shit culminating in an old man talking about how dating three women at once MIGHT make him forget about the love of his life who passed away. Um...what? After that, well...shit only goes one way on a hill.

This movie was supposed to be a movie about adults, which should have had some mature things to say. Only, no one acts like an adult in this movie. They act like idiotic, self-centered, sex-crazed, petty, retarded assclowns. This movie wanted to tell you that your life's never over, and that everyone has their huckleberry somewhere out there. But they built their whole dating profiles through LIES, and their only connection was made by Cusack spitting some philosophical shit about the universe. And then the ending of this movie, holy god. Are you kidding me?

Thanks Must Love Dogs. Thanks for ruining a good vibe I had going. And to bring DOGS, cute, adorable, lovable dogs into this. You deserve no less than death. If this is what I'm going to act like as a 40 something, god...I better find someone before I get there. God save me.

Up Next: Keeping the Faith

Not Best Picture: Slumdog Millionaire  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

slumdogglobes

Cross posted here...

To be honest, if I had an Oscar ballot this year (and honestly, why don't I?), I'd write-in The Wrestler. Ayo! But if I had to vote off the ones that were actually nominated, I'd vote Slumdog Millionaire in a walk. To me, Slumdog is the closest thing we had to a universally great movie this year, one that was both massively entertaining and thoughtfully rewarding. And that's pretty much how I judge which movie deserves to be "Best Picture": the movie that can convey meaningful themes and messages in the most entertaining and universal way possible.

Slumdog hit the ground running after TIFF and Telluride, garnering a massive buzz and earning a limited U.S. release. In a year where the biggest story had been the crushing, cynical realism of Christopher Nolan's The Dark Knight, word about a movie as rich and uplifting as Slumdog Millionaire had people excited, and for good reason. Everything about Slumdog represented the sunny side of movies, from the cute kid actors, to the sappy love story, to the feel good ending. The mix of Indian culture and Bollywood infused stylings gave this movie pretty much everything it possibly could have needed to take the world by storm. And I'd be tempted to give it a pass in the Not Best Picture series if the movie had stuck with what worked for it, mainly the unflinching peek into the lives of Mumbai "slumdogs" (is that term derogatory?), the unapologetic romance, and the joyful Bollywood flourishes.

The movie's biggest problem is also its biggest asset: the structure of the plot. The whole, gameshow question/flashback/explanation hook has the effect of whipping you into such a frenzy by the end of the movie, you really don't have any time to stop and consider how....moderately pointless all of this is. Do we REALLY care why Jamal knows the answers? When you watch it for the first time, of course you do, but it doesn't really matter so long as Jamal gets the answers right and gets to keep playing. On multiple views, the movie loses a good amount of steam. You know why he knows, you know he's not lying, you know he's going to win and everything's going to be okay. But objectively, you knew all of that going into the movie, didn't you? Add to that, the clumsy handling of Salim's death or the stiff-as-a-board portrayal by the adult Latika, the movie's got some holes in it that are easily filled by the grand awesomeness of "when are they getting to the fireworks factory" effect that the plot structure has on viewers.

I'm not going to sit here and try to tear down a movie that I personally loved. While it's true that there are no perfect movies, there are near-perfect movie moments that keep you watching movies, like a junkie searching for that first high again. And really, other than a few minor nitpicks, the only criticism I can really lob at Slumdog is that it's never going to be as good as the first time. So screw it, I'm cheering for this one to win.

Not Best Picture: The Reader  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

Cross posted here, with a formal review here.

The Reader swooped in and took the fifth slot for the Best Picture category, against other sorta-favorites like Revolutionary Road, Doubt, Wall-E, and The Dark Knight (am I missing any here?). It's just one of those movies that, while good on paper, is just kinda...a boring masterpiece on screen. There's no question that Daldry's vision of love and repentance, told against the backdrop of the Holocaust, is a feat. The movie is beautiful, slow, quiet, and delicate with complex themes of guilt and justice haunting Hanna and Michael's love over their whole lives. But really, you could've swapped in Rev Road or Doubt, and I wouldn't have even blinked. You could've swapped in TDK or Wall-E and made for a more interesting Best Picture category. And really, you could never see The Reader and your life really wouldn't be much different. I put it in a category I like to call "The English Patient Movies," which is funny seeing as I've never actually seen The English Patient. But it's just a group of movies that while I'm sure are all high quality, emotionally moving, and time-worthy affairs, I'm just not that interested in seeing it. Maybe some of them would rise above the pack and become favorites, but mostly I'm just sure that I'd get bored at some point in all of them.*

I'd go on about why I don't think The Reader should win Best Picture, but honestly. It's not going to. So why bother? Go see it if you want, it's a great movie, don't get me wrong. But if you haven't seen the others in this category, I'd knock them out first.

* Other movies in this category: The Piano, The Constant Gardener

Draft: ACTION SEQUENCES! Round 1  

Posted by WEREbal in , ,

It's been far too long since we had a draft around these parts, but we're coming out swinging. The idea is pretty simple:

PICK THE BEST ACTION SEQUENCES FROM FILMS

Photobucket
1) JC - Cuba, Bad Boys II. The most needless, loudest and completely awesome action sequence I've ever seen.

LD- CORRECT ANSWER!

The movie was clearly over by that point, but you can tell Bay was like "Hmm..what if we had Tapia kidnap Sydney so we could have the Bad Boys INVADE CUBA AND WIN?"

SN - Every movie should end with an invasion of Cuba -- possibly even in
the closing credits, just for the hell of it. I need a moment to gather my thoughts now.

LD - The invasion of Cuba is among my favorite scenes in Pride & Prejudice.

E - SN, just go with your gut and pick "The Passion of the Christ"...you know you've watched that action movie at least 30 times.

Photobucket

2) N8 - All the action scenes in Lock, Stock, and Two Smoking Barrels. Not only does this movie feature some of the violent action sequences you came to expect (after this movie) from Vinnie Jones, but it also involved some lighter action sequences like the BB-gun defense of the weed-stocked Alamo. The movie, really, is a series of interlaced action scenes that build to the final showdown, in the style of a Western. Except Lock Stock isn't quite as predictable, and -- unlike the fast-cut style that culminated in the shakey scenes in Quantum of Solace -- all the action sequences in Lock Stock are followable with the human eye.

BadBoyschase

3) SN - Man, I've really been wrestling with this decision. I seriously thought about some other picks, but I'd just feel wrong if I didn't pick a scene from Bad Boys 2. JC may have taken Cuba, but I'll take the freeway chase scene. Nothing like shooting up Haitians, dodging cars being thrown at you off a truck, then avoiding corpses to boot. Oh, did I mention Mike Lowry was driving? Mike LOW-RY.

Photobucket

4) LD - Kill Bill vol. 1 - The House of Blue Leaves

I'm not sure there's an action sequence better than this. It's poetic, funny, and brutal, really anything and everything you could want from an action sequence. The final battle with O-Ren Ishii is just gorgeous. This is two masters (Tarantino, Woo Ping) at the pinnacle of their craft.

Photobucket

5) E - Shaun of the Dead - Winchester Fight through the end of the movie

Since the movie ends with one extended action sequence, I'm picking the sequence from the Winchester until they hole themselves up in the basement. Not only is there the awesome juke box scene, where the camera spins around the crew as they hit the old man in the head, but it also has Shaun firing the rifle at the zombies in the windows, the fire on the bar exploding the bullets into the heads of the zombies, and of course, the emotionally powerful scene with his mother. It's a smorgasbord of awesomeness.

Photobucket

6) Grimbil - Opening scene to Blade 1. Meat locker, sexy chicks, loud techno, blood bath, then Wesley Snipes kicking some serious ass.

We'll be back tomorrow with Round 2.




Rom Com Roundup: Music & Lyrics [11 of 30]  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

music-and-lyrics2
[Rom Com Roundup is a project where I watch 30 romantic comedies I've never seen from now until valentine's day and document how it affects my outlook on love. (Link to the full list of movies)]

The Movie: Music & Lyrics

The Blurb: A washed up 80's pop star has one shot at getting back into the big time by writing a song for a young starlet. While he's great with melody, he's terrible with lyrics, and inadvertently stumbles on Sophie, his house...plant waterer, or something, who has a quirk of talking to herself and singing random lyrics to any music playing around her. He hires her to write the song he needs, and wouldn't you know it, they fall in love. KISMET!

The Conventions: montage, revealing past skeletons, the "how do you know it's love" conversation between women

Did I Cry? Nope..didn't. I'm convinced it's never going to happen. I'm dead inside.

Current State of Mind: Wow, I should NOT have watched this right after Nick and Norah's Infinite Playlist. I wouldn't say this movie is necessarily bad, but it's definitely not good. I was talking to someone while finishing it up, and called it a Fresca, or Crystal Light. It barely exists. Sure, it tries, and god bless it for trying so hard to make some sort of commentary about the creation of music and how it mirrors love (don't you get it, the MUSIC is like the physical attraction, and the LYRICS are like the things you fall in love with). But the actual love affair in this movie takes such a backseat to the story of Hugh Grant's character, that you almost don't really care whether they end up together or not.

Still, there's something kinda poignant about comparing the way a washed up rock star views making music with the way adults having been through heartbreak may view love. Yes, it's cheesy, that it just takes the right song/person to make you believe again, after being so cynical about it for so many years, but it's true. Even the song they write, "A Way Back Into Love" (and dammit, it's kinda catchy) is centered on this concept. To everyone out there who hasn't felt love in a while, you (and I) might just have to accept...we got a lot of unthrilling songs to hear before one hits us the right way. But, y'know, it's better than no music at all...

Don't know why, but I'm 11 down, and feeling...pretty positive right now. it's probably all the glue I've been huffing.

Up Next: Must Love Dogs

Not Best Picture: Milk  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

Cross posted here....

For funsies, I'm going through each of the Best Picture nominees and talking about why I don't think they should win Best Picture. And being that I'm going from worst to first (except for The Reader, which I just saw today, so will be last to let it marinate a bit), today I get the privilege of trying to break down the movie I actually do believe will win Best Picture, Milk.

Milk's biggest problem was something completely out of its own control: the political environment of 2008. Put out in limited release in late October, by the time Milk found its way to most theaters, the smoke had already cleared from election day and the fallout of Proposition 8 and other referendums around the country regarding gay marriage. Which isn't to say that things might have been different had Milk been released earlier, but what was once seen as a potential victory lap for the gay rights movement now became a stinging reminder of how much work still needed to be done. And with that knowledge came an expectation, that the ghost of Harvey Milk would heal our wounds and inspire us from beyond the grave, this time on the screen. The fact that Milk isn't unbelievably awesome somehow makes you MORE disappointed in it, if only because this was the movement's time in the spotlight. For those of us on the same side of the aisle, it was disappointing that the movie was merely very, very good.

It's hard to know where Milk loses its focus. The movie feels long, even though exposition-wise, there really wasn't that much explanation for a lot of Harvey's crew, or for the central conflict between him and Dan White, the man who would eventually become Harvey's killer. I credit Van Sant for making this film less dreamy and meandering than his last few efforts, but wonder why, given the subject material, he didn't go more with the Good Will Hunting/Finding Forrester vibe. The movie was in desperate need of a bigger heart, and while all the elements are there, they never really come together into anything that you can empathize with. The story is moving because of the subject matter, not necessarily because anyone in the film really grabs a hold of you.

All that being said, Penn really did no wrong in this movie. But here, Penn's performance hogs the air a bit, sometimes obscuring the bigger picture this film should have been pushing. A lot of people say that Harvey Milk was really like that, a man aching to be in the spotlight and narcissistic to a fault. Again, if that was true, the film never gave any indication that we should view Harvey in that way. Instead, the power and veracity of Penn's performance, while jaw-droppingly awesome, sometimes took you out of the story. When combined with the odd portrayal of Diego Luna's character and the lack of focus for Brolin's performance as Dan White, the movie just seemed MORE uneven. And as I've said before, I'm reluctant to praise a movie based on one person's performance.

I wonder what my feelings would be on Milk had the events of this election year never happened. Would I be so full of expectations for a film that is, let's face it, the laziest of all narratives: the biopic? I doubt it, and maybe I would've been able to enjoy the high quality and messages that Milk sought to espouse. But given the political atmosphere, this film needed to be more, and the fact that it fell short only creates a sense of disappointment and lost potential. I'm fairly certain that Milk will win, and I say bravo. It's an important film that deserves accolades and a moment at the podium to call out those who seek to push back the very things it seeks to accomplish. But the movie in a vacuum leaves a lot to be desired.

Hope in the Time of Cholera [politics]  

Posted by N8 in , ,

With the recent double-swearing in of Jesus as president, the world seems back on track. In just a few days, it has been remarkable the amount of progress accomplished just by undoing the regressive executive orders of the last eight years...

As the resident contrarian around here, I was challenged to name a single thing about the advent of the Age Of Obama that made the world materially worse off than it was before. Not some Fox News fabrication, but an actual true fact about the state of the world that makes it less appealing now than it was before. Not as easy as I thought it might have been, when I started to think about it. But then I thought about the great romantic poets.

Echoing others and to be echoed by so many others, Shakespeare's plays and sonnets are good examples of a very common poetic backdrop. Romantic poets in all ages are quick to invoke the idea that life is short, so that it more easily follows that you should grab love while you are still vertical. For example,

'Tis beauty truly blent, whose red and white
Nature's own sweet and cunning hand laid on:

Lady, you are the cruell'st she alive,

If you will lead these graces to the grave

And leave the world no copy.

- Viola to Oliva, Twelfth Night, I.v

Some of the most invoked sonnets make use of mortality as the literary backdrop to the wooer's immediate request that their love be requited. Summer's lease hath all too short a date is the poetic equivalent of "none of us will be young and beautiful forever, so are you sure you don't want to see the back of my Nisan Sentra?"


As a poetic go-to theme, you don't have to look far to see the transitory nature of life, beauty and youth invoked as an incitement to ill-advised coupling. Staring the prospect of death in the face has a way of loosening the corsets of young ladies, and the backdrop of Time's scythe isn't uncommon in poetry. It's an odd image to go with the flowers, unless you think about why it's there.

You see the idea everywhere in modern movies, too, from the girl in Airplane ("I don't know if we're going to get out of this, and I don't want to die a virgin") to that little kid in the back of the truck with the drunk crop-duster's daughter in Independence Day, whose incitement to sex is the simple line: the world is ending.

Well, that's what Obama has taken from some of us. It is much more difficult to declare to a would-be lover that the end is neigh with the same conviction as it was a week ago. Under Bush, "the sky is falling" was a frighteningly appropriate refrain, and I fear that the foregrounding of the end of days as a romantic hook has receded before this new tide of Hope. If "Yes, We Can" doesn't develop it's own free-love cache soon, I'm going to have to go back to asking the duty nurse at the maternity ward which birth certificates only have one parent's name on them...

2009 is all about a showdown.  

Posted by WEREbal in , ,


Here in America, we have a proud tradition of ridiculously bad-ass action movies. Who among us will ever forget the exploits of John McClane, John Spartan, John Matrix, or John Highlyimprobablebutincrediblybadasslastname? None of the writers at this site, that's for sure. That's why we're so amped about the year 2009. Sure, we may not have the A-list action heroes of yesteryear, but we've traded them in on something better, namely, truly awesome action films.

Ask any guy who loves movies about Crank, and you're likely to see them go into an awesomeness-induced Grand Mal seizure. Chev Chelios, the adrenaline-addicted man with a literally indestructible heart was the star of the most insane, off-the-wall, and innovative action film of the last...ever? Come this April, he's back in Crank 2: High Voltage



Ever the DeGaullists, France has spied the awesomeness that America is about to unleash on the world, and has decided to unload their biggest weapon against us: a sequel to District B13. The movie that made parkour really, really cool returns with a bigger budget, the same leads and (unfortunately) wire work. Still, who can resist the siren's song of French guys jumping through tiny openings and fighting off a corrupt government through the power of flipping?



Oh, and you can go ahead and suck it, Bond films. No more stealing B13's thunder.

Rom Com Roundup: Kissing Jessica Stein [10 of 30]  

Posted by S. Stills in , ,

[Rom Com Roundup is a project where I watch 30 romantic comedies I've never seen from now until valentine's day and document how it affects my outlook on love. (Link to the full list of movies)]

The Movie: Kissing Jessica Stein

The Blurb: Jessica's a newspaper writer who's dating life is in shambles, whether due to the awful men she meets or the fact that she's nuttier than a Payday bar. When she answers a personal ad due to an affinity for the literary quote a young woman uses, she decides to try her hand at being a lesbian. She starts dating Helen, a young free-spirited bisexual, and learns how to adjust her neuroses to her new relationship, and in the end learns that it's not so much about the men or women in her life, but really her own outlook that has kept her unhappy for so long. Or something. Plus a svelte Jon Hamm's in it, who I'm totally gay for (no pun intended).

The Conventions: catty gay guy friends, frank discussion of how women have sex with each other, bad dating montage!, Barry White as an awkward lovemaking soundtrack, artists are free spirits!

Did I Cry? I felt a little moved when her mother accepted her. It got a little dusty in here.

Current State of Mind: Well this was nice. I got to actually watch a movie that didn't make me cringe or vomit. I really enjoyed Kissing Jessica Stein, and whether that's because it's inherently good or because I just finished watching Good Luck Chuck is up to you to decide, but there was something refreshing about seeing things from the woman's point of view. The only movie I've seen up to now that had a woman's point of view was 27 Dresses, and we all know how well that went.

I was kind of surprised at how conventional this movie was. I don't know why I expected it to be any different just b/c it involved two women, but I did...and I was surprised to see how much I could actually relate to Stein, as neurotic as I am. There's something both entertaining, but also disheartening about the fact that *SPOILER* Helen and Jessica couldn't make it work, mostly because of her bubbling cauldron of totally undertsandable neuroses. And in all honesty, the reason they broke up (not enough sex!) will probably cloud the fact that they should've broken up months, eons ago. It was clear that Helen would lose patience with her, just as clear as Jessica would never be able to fully make herself into what Helen wanted out of a serious lesbian relationship. The double standard here being that as a guy, I don't have the added social pressure of having to get hitched up by the time I'm 30 in the same way most of my female friends do. But I think I have enough neurotic landmines to suffice.

The end of this movie also marked the first movie I've seen where the end didn't result in a nice ribbon-tied-on-a-box ending, which was surprisingly satisfying being that so many rom coms are built around this expectation that the happy ending is coming. It actually made me feel BETTER, not having to watch couples on screen having everything figured out perfectly, realizing that there's no rush when it comes to finding love, or something like it. It was a nice change of pace, probably one that I needed.

Up Next: Music and Lyrics.

Not Best Picture: The Curious Case of Benjamin Button  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,

Cross posted here.

You've already heard my complaints about Ben Button, so it's really no surprise that I don't think it deserves to win Best Picture. I've already called this movie an "emotional molestation," the kind of movie that forces you into a corner where you either have to abandon the movie, or give in to the blatantly obvious emotional play that it seeks to accomplish. Sure, there's some heart to this movie, but it wastes the conceit by shutting you out of Button's mind, giving you absolutely nothing to project onto him and no guidance as to how the events in Button's life are supposed to feel to us, the viewers. The whole movie is about the lack of connection with any of the characters, which some may say is the point being that Button is so disconnected from everyone around him due to his condition. But this movie is, at its heart, a love story, and it tries to sell the love story by pushing sympathy for characters you never connect with. The emotion you feel rings out because it's familiar territory, a pavlovian response to certain cinematic markers that you've seen hundreds of times before, not from anything organic in the movie itself.

Maybe this coldness comes from the meticulous style of Fincher, who definitely paints the movie in such a stunning visual style, you're almost tempted to give it a pass. The movie is a joy to behold in almost every scene. The moment where Button sits on the deck over the water and the camera splits the sun ray around his head is the kind of shot that directors search their whole lifetimes for, and watching it on the big screen kinda takes your breath away. But I'm not content in watching a movie simply because it looks fantastic (*cough* ATONEMENT). Because of the inherent problems with the script and performances, the visual stylings border on self-indulgence, as the scenery really serves no purpose other than creating an impressive visual feat. I'd say that maybe the point was to create a warm beauty to juxtapose with the cold fashion of the story, but I highly doubt Eric Roth (writer of Forrest Gump) would ever create something so cold on purpose. Instead, the coldness and disconnect in the screenplay leads me to think that it's a failed effort at creating something emotionally meaningful, a fact that Fincher's handiwork only seeks to reinforce through contrast.

In the end, Benjamin Button is the kind of movie that deserves recognition of the highest caliber, because it is an accomplishment, faults aside. But as for being representative of the best of the year, it falls short of the bar it sets for itself and everything it had going for it. Oh, and it will never win because David Fincher is an asshole.

Rom Com Roundup: Good Luck Chuck [9 of 30]  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,



[Rom Com Roundup is a project where I watch 30 romantic comedies I've never seen from now until valentine's day and document how it affects my outlook on love. (Link to the full list of movies)]

First off, I'm way way behind. I can't imagine why I haven't had time to watch movies this past week, it's not like anything important was happening in DC. So the long and short of it is, the Rom Com Roundup is going into hyperdrive, and the order and list of movies will change based on what I can get my hands on the fastest. But I couldn't disappoint everyone who warned me that Good Luck Chuck would actually break my brain. Because I'm a masochist, here you are....the ruination of my fucking dignity and self-worth.

The Movie: Good Luck Chuck

The Blurb: A guy spurns a goth chick in a game of spin the bottle in high school, resulting in a hex that dooms him to never be able to hold on to love while it sprouts all around him. Whoever thought this kid would grow up to be nuclear wastepile Dane Cook, whose ex-girlfriends have now spread the rumor that after having sex with him, they'll meet their true love. Wow, that must REALLY suck for him now that all these ridiculously hot women want to have sex with him so they can leave him alone and get married to someone else (y'know, cuz uggos don't need true love anyway). So he meets the love of his life, who ALSO happens to be smoking hot but a total klutz. She's also Jessica Alba, so she allegedly has herpes, so there's that. After he falls in love with her, he tries to avoid having sex with her as long as possible. But when he finally does have sex with her, he learns he has to let her go if it's really meant to be. Oh also, a penguin bites his dick.

The Conventions: Retarded cretin friend, sex montage?, cute animals, and every single song in the soundtrack or score.

Did I Cry: Absolutely not.

Current State of Mind: Look, there's no two ways around it. This is a god awful, terrible fucking movie. It's an assault on your intelligence, your dignity, your respectability, and everything that's true and real in this country. You think I'm exaggerating? This movie goes out of its way to offend you, either through pointlessly awful toilet humor, mean spirited jokes at the expense of fat and/or ugly people, and the fact that you have to watch people think Dane Cook is attractive and/or charming. But it's not the simple fact that this movie has any of those, it's the extent the movie will go in each of these realms. It's not just toilet humor or sex jokes, you ACTUALLY see Dane Cook's boner through his underwear. It's not just fat or ugly people, it's obese whales full of acne and pubic hair leaking out of her bikini. And it's not just Dane Cook acting, it's Dane Cook doing his whole fucking bit in sporadic parts of this movie. It's not just Dane Cook having sex, it's Dane Cook having sex with tons of topless, ridiculous hot women in graphic detail. And believe me, these are all blazingly offensive to every single corner of your soul.

And y'know what sucks? The fact that this movie actually kinda managed to cobble together a semblance of an emotional center. True, it inhabits about 10 minutes, no scratch that, 5 minutes of the whole movie, but it's there. There's something moderately compelling about the conceit, a guy who's a stepping stone to real relationships and can't hold on to the only girl he wants. But if ever a real, legitimate moment pops up (like, the pebble at the end, sure it's writing on the level of a middle schooler, but a really creative middle schooler), the movie's completely content to ruin it five seconds later with a fart or boner joke. There was even one "serious" scene where I laughed in the face of the tv...yeah, I RAN UP to the tv to LAUGH AT IT, it was so fucking terrible. Ugh, JUST TERRIBLE. UGH! A PENGUIN SHITS, AND THEN EATS ITS OWN SHIT! WHY!?!??!

UGH. What is my current state of mind. I have no fucking idea. If you love something, set it free. Thanks Good Luck Chuck, I needed to watch a movie to learn something that I could read off a fucking fortune cookie. And as for the thoughts on love in my own life?....................I got nothing.

Up Next: Kissing Jessica Stein...I called an audible, b/c I need to watch a film with some quality or else I'll seriously have an aneurysm.

Overkill River: The Story So Far  

Posted by WEREbal in ,



I think we're all willing to admit that reading through the Overkill River series that we're doing with our friends at Hey, There's a Bird in This Mirror! takes more than a bit of stamina. At the same time, the content of these entries is (1) phenomenal and (2) probably the best evaluation you'll find on a band that richly deserves to considered in this manner. So, with great humility (and recognition of the fact that the Joe Budden stuff is a more entertaining diversion), we all suggest that you take the time to not only read these entries, but listen to the songs that they reference.

Part 1 - Dave



Part 2 - E



Part 3 - Raina



Part 4 - LD



Part 5 - Dave

Joe Budden/Nixon  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

What if...well, you get the picture (and if you don't, click on the above link '2009 year of the Budden' for the entire series to date).




Nixon's team would have hired Jay-Z to attend the interviews and silently mock Joe Budden off-camera throughout.

James Reston Jr. would not have been played by Sam Rockwell. He would have been played by jut plain Rockwell, and he would have teamed up with Budden for a sick rap remix of "Somebody's Watching Me."

After Budden had just nailed the former president with a great question, he would have stood up and started rhyming "Pump It Up" with beats blaring over the sound system.

Four days before the final session, a drunk Nixon calls Budden. Budden, expecting a call from a ladyfriend about dinner arrangements, answers "cheeseburgers." When he finds out it's really Nixon on the phone, he hangs up and goes to the In-N-Out Burger.

Not Best Picture: Frost/Nixon  

Posted by S. Stills in , , ,



Cross-posted at Filmicism

For the next week, let's do a little hateratin' on the best picture nominees, shall we? I'm going backwards in ranking (worst to first), so let's start with the bottom spot on my list, Frost/Nixon.

I've been pretty open about my love for Frost/Nixon. I placed it at #5 in my top ten list for the year, and gave it a pretty glowing review to boot. There's no question that I really enjoyed the movie, more than a lot of others even. But there's no way that this picture represents the best that came out in 2008.

Cinema has an inherent ability to convey atmosphere, to keep the viewer immersed in the world that the director and writer creates. But there's nothing special about the world that Howard depicts on screen. I've said it before, Howard's biggest contribution was getting out of the way of Morgan's screenplay, and letting the camera linger on Sheen and Langella's performances. Every time he does try to add a little flair, the movie sags. It's no surprise that this movie worked so well as a play, and in my opinion probably worked BETTER as a play, seeing as the movie's effectiveness revolves around the fact that you're removed from the experience to a certain degree. You know that Langella's not Nixon, you know how it ends, and you know that history has already given both of these men their due (whether deserved or not). In the confines of a play, there's a self-awareness of both the actors and the audience in coming to grips with how much you're willing to accept as reality, and what you're going to parse out as fiction. Are you going to watch the actors' performances, or are you going to believe that these actors are the characters they say they are. Movies are where we're supposed to get lost, and Frost/Nixon did little to add to that side of the experience, and even took steps (the talking heads, the faux-documentary style, the arguably unnecessary epilogue) to pull you out of it.

I'm also coming to a point where I'm getting more and more reluctant to give such high accolades to a movie solely based on performances (something we'll get to BIG TIME in Milk). Langella deserves the oscar in my eyes, even over Penn and Rourke; and Sheen and co. do a great job of rounding out the cast. And while it may be fascinating for me to sit and watch singular performances, or see Morgan's screenplay unfold into one of the most unassuming yet spectacular climaxes of the year, the MOVIE Frost/Nixon doesn't add much to a play where two men would simply sit on an empty stage, talking back and forth. This isn't like There Will Be Blood, where Daniel Day Lewis's performance was central to the meaning and effectiveness of the movie as a whole. Frost/Nixon is hinging its power on not only the performances, but the history and ghosts that these figures bring to the screen, something that Langella and Sheen can't add to with a simple line read, and something that Howard doesn't effectively convey more than a lazy metaphor to our current administration and the desire to see Bush "put on trial" in the way he will never be.

Frost/Nixon is a great movie that fails to deliver on the most central message to the movie: the power of the camera, the theater of media, the exposing light of truth. It reads you the story of a book, when it should be SHOWING you the emotions and messages it seeks to convey. This failure is a testament to Morgan's play, and the performances of the actors...that it still manages to be a powerful, moving experience. It just wasn't the best of the year.

OJ: Back after a week away  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

It's been a week since we saw Camp OJ chillin with the Real Killahz. Where have they been?

Overkill River, Or ‘That’s an Awful Lot of Analysis for “Some Mid-Level Band,”’ Part 4  

Posted by WEREbal in , ,


Overkill River: The Lie We Share


"One minute was enough, Tyler said, a person had to work hard for it, but a minute of perfection was worth the effort. A moment was the most you could ever expect from perfection." ~Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, Chapter 3


Begin with the assumption that, for a musician, the moment that a new song is created is a moment of perfection. In that moment the song is genuine, a snapshot of a state of mind or emotion. But, like Tyler Durden says, a moment is the most you can ever expect for perfection. With a song, once that moment passes, it's time to play the music and sing the lyrics fifty times in order to hammer it into a perfected, ready-to-record state. Then, once you're in the studio, you'll have to do another thirty takes to make sure that you've captured the best possible version of the song. Each time you sing those words and hear that melody, you're a little further removed from the moment you once immortalized. And each time you try to find the raw nerve that inspired you to write in the first place, it's a little more numb, partially due to distance and partially due to fatigue. There's only so many times that you can allow yourself to feel the same pain, to punish yourself for the same mistakes, or to remember the red in her cheeks as you walked together on that cold winter's night.


So, what's left after perfection's moment has passed? If you believe Will Sheff and Okkervil River, the answer is "a lie". It's the lie that exists when the artist is on stage, singing for the thousandth time about a lover he wronged long ago, and the lie that exists when a lonely kid in the big city internalizes that song and decides that the singer understands the pain he feels. It's the lie that convinced Shannon Wilsey to chase the love of rock stars and the lie that tortured Savannah when she realized that her fame couldn't keep her company on her nights alone.


The question now becomes "why do we all fall for this lie?" Why do the fans who know they're being lied to continue to sing along? Why do the musicians who know that they're lying continue to do it? The answer is that there's no reason to continue the lie...unless it's kicks.


"Unless It's Kicks" - The Stage Names


The thing about musicians is that the fans tend to assume that because they're on stage, they're larger than life and therefore immune to the needs and insecurities that we all feel. "Unless It's Kicks" dismantles that conception. The song is about the catch-22 that arises from being creative and being adored. On one hand, creative individuals have the desire to express themselves, or in other terms, to continually create the moments of perfection discussed above. On the other hand, like most drugs, fame is addicting. "Unless It's Kicks" is sung from the perspective of a moderately famous musician who is also a self-described "sick man". The listener is introduced to him as he's on tour and he's "been driving too long / on a dark windless night / with the radio on / with the towns flying by". It's clear that, emotionally, the singer is in dire straits:


What pulls your body down, and that is quicksand
So, climb out quick, hand over hand
Before your mouth's all filled up


But, at the same time, things aren't hopeless. He's out on tour because it helps him stave off the pain that comes when the stage lights fade. In fact, he's out driving because he's "on a seven day high". His drug of choice?


That heavenly song

Punches right through my heart

And hums through my blood.


In case all that was too obtuse, Sheff comes right out and spells out the equation for us:


What picks you up from down unless it's tricks, man?
When I been fixed, I am convinced that I will not get so broke up again


The cure for his sickness is tricks...or, synonymously, the lie at the center of these two albums. He's going to go on stage and sing until he's cured. But, it's not as simple as that. Don't lose sight of Raina's entry about musicians and their many loves. It's no coincidence that this sick man is singing about how he does this all for kicks, and in one verse talks about "tricks" that pick him "up from down", and will do so until he's "fixed". There's a dichotomy in these two readings that's central to what Sheff is saying. On one hand he's on stage, singing about something that used to be true because he's hooked on the love he gets from his fans. On the other, it is his indulgences in the trappings of his mid-level fame that keep him broken.


It would be pathetic if the singer was unaware of what he was doing, but more importantly, it wouldn't ring true. As fans, it's easy to look at artists from our perspective, to imagine that they always love playing Akron, and think that Akron fans are the best fans in the world, and that they're really killing themselves on stage because their music really means something. In reality, every city has the best fans, because that sells. The band loves playing every city because every city loves them in return. As for the song that played the first time you tentatively pressed your lips against hers? The song that got you through a family member's illness? The singer tells us directly:


And I know it's a lie
But I'll still give my love
Hey, my heart's on the line
For your hands to pluck off


What gives this mess some grace unless it's fictions
Unless it's licks, man
Unless it's lies or it's love?


There's your confession. It's all a lie, and on the level that the fans appreciate, what he's doing is meaningless to him. It's only the lie that means something, the fiction in the earnestness of his performance and the love he receives in return that keeps him going. It's important to note that he genuinely loves the fans. They give him a rush that he can't find anywhere else, and he doesn't lose sight of what he owes them. At the same time, despite the mutual love they share, the fans will always be at a distance from him because they're not getting "him". They're getting an obsolete version of him, a version of him diminished by a dozen cities and a thousand miles and the screaming of countless crowds. They're getting the person that they've created in their head, the one that understands them, and the one with whom they'd totally be friends if only they could meet.


In a heartbreaking turn, the song ends on a lamentation. The singer knows the love his fans feel for him is false, and when he's willing to be introspective, it eats him up inside:


What breaks this heart the most is the ghost of some rock and roll fan
Exploding up from the stands
With her heart opened up
And I want to tell her, "your love isn't lost"
Say, "my heart is still crossed"
Scream, "you're so wonderful"

What a dream in the dark
About working so hard
About glowing so stoned
Trying not to turn off
Trying not to believe in that lie all on your own.


Sadly, the love of this dream of a fan is lost, because it's not for the singer. His heart can't be crossed (and hope to die), because he knows that he's lying. He'd love nothing more than to resist "turning off" and to feel the songs the way his fans do, but he can't wish away what he knows. This is the hollowness that threatens to drown him like quicksand, and it's caused by the same thrills that his creativity provides him.


"Pop Lie" - The Stand Ins


"Unless It's Kicks" is the sentiment that occurs when you have an artistic individual who is "genuine". This is the type of artist who romanticizes the lie and regrets his role in the equation. What happens when you encounter a cynical artist who was lying from the start? "Pop Lie" exists to cover the songs that never had a moment of perfection. Not every artist is Will Sheff, Win Butler, or Craig Finn. For every artist whose pen writes in blood and won't leave the stage until they collapse, there are legions of Ryan Cabreras and Jessica Simpsons. "Pop Lie" is Sheff's admonishment of the fans who adore crap and believe that Celine Dion and Rascal Flatts are spewing platitudes just for them. These are the artists who are the result of focus groups and demographic testing, the ones who produce songs that are:


All sweetly sung and succinctly stated
Words and music he calculated
To make you sing along
With your stereo on
As you stand in your shorts on your lawn


There's nothing wrong with music for good times. In fact, nothing goes better with good times than music. Where Sheff takes issue with the fans is when they diminish their own experiences by tying it to music that's unworthy of the experience. To wit:


Get completely incorporated
By some couple who consummated
Their first love by the dawn
A falling star wished upon
And flashed in the sky and was gone


To be certain, there's a smirk in Sheff's example. However, even if this couple shared their love without the celestial blessing, the point remains true. It only sullies the beauty and honesty of the moment to forever tie it to Bryan Adams' "(Everything I do) I Do It For You". There are a million other couples out there that will do the same thing, and Sheff demands that his listeners do better for themselves.


And mouths wet and long hair braided,
By the back room, the kids all waited
To meet the man in bright green
Who had dreamed up the dream that they wrecked their hearts upon

He's the liar who lied in his pop song
And you're lying when you sing along
And you're lying when you sing along


The conception of the fan here is strikingly different from that of "Unless It's Kicks". While the singer in "Kicks" does love his fans and hates the distance between them, these fans get a much less gentle treatment. Salivating and dressed up, they want a piece of the man who penned the song that mistreated their love. For their mistake, Sheff tries to shout to them and tell them about how wrong they are. While he is concerned about exposing the hypocrisy of the man in bright green, he's also partially condemning the fans for their mistake in loving the wrong way. It's probably not coincidental that the people who buy into the lie in this instance are children. There's certainly commentary on the mindstate of the fan whose heart is stirred by Gavin DeGraw to be found throughout this song.


Particularly telling in the previous verse is the distance between the artist and his fans. In "Kicks", the artist's "heart's on the line / for your hands to pluck off" during his show. In "Pop Lie", the artist is separated from his fans as they wait outside his dressing room. The immediacy of the relationship (false or not) between the genuine artist and his fans in presented not only as more visceral, but as mutual. The man in bright green is given no lines and no perspective, kept distant from his fans and from the listener, because he is ultimately more false for not even attempting to reach his fans with something honest.


So, here's the car seat, so cruelly weighted
And here's the faces already faded
At the end of the day
When they just threw away the only good thing that they owned,

And now they're pinned down and strangulated


The story of our listeners continues. The couple who consummated their relationship? The weight in that car seat is forever. The fresh faces already faded? The fans outside the dressing room were kids, after all. Both threw away the only good thing that they owned: their individuality. Now they're left in newer, uglier circumstances, and they never bothered to become anything more than generic. As a result, they're left hopeless and burdened.


Week by week, it climbs up and comes on
And we're feeling alright, though we know it's all wrong
I'm ashamed to admit that I can't help resist what I wished was the truth, but it's not

And I truly believe we're not strong
And we'll sing 'til our voices are gone
And then sink beneath that manicured lawn.


Here's the part that bothers Sheff. It's that these people are settling. They could do more, they could be more, they could look for something better, but instead they use the crap as anesthesia, numbing themselves from cradle to the grave.


Sheff leaves us on another snarky note:


This is respectfully dedicated
To the woman who concentrated
All of her love to find
That she'd wasted it on
The liar who lied in this song


Ultimately, the lie isn't a good thing or a bad thing. It's a necessary thing. It's what drives the people who can create great music to keep creating and it gives the fans something to love. But, the argument is that the "smaller" the lie, the better off we all are. One theme that runs between both of these songs is the importance of being genuine. This is because the lie isn't just a part of music, it's a part of everything. To call "the lie" a lie is probably too damning, but it serves to illustrate the point. In reality, the lie is simply what's lost in translation in the communication between artists and their fans. These gaps in understanding exist not only between artists and fans, but in every conversation and every relationship, and by permitting as few of them as possible we open the door for a more fulfilling life. This is why Sheff hates the artists who lie from the start, and to a lesser degree, the fans who love the big lie. Rather than searching for the truth, they accept a shorthand version of their emotions and their desires.


It's easy to condemn Sheff for being too demanding, too stringently "ethical", for want of a better term. There's nothing wrong with enjoying all types of music, even the junk food. But, tellingly, he never condemns the people who understand that Kelly Clarkson writes astounding pop songs while remaining aware enough to resist internalizing the lyrics. It's only the people who truly believe that "Since U Been Gone" tells the story of their recovery from a breakup with whom he takes issue. By my tolerance, he's still setting too strict a standard for his audience, because emotions work on both a micro and a macro level. More importantly, art and the appreciation thereof, while important, is only one small aspect of a life well-lived. It is possible to have generic or poor taste and live a life far less tragic than Sheff suggests. However, his overall point is still well-made and well-taken.


Sheff's points about developing one's own taste is why the "mid-level" band element of "Unless It's Kicks" (and, non-coincidentally, Okkervil River) is so pertinent to the message of these songs. In the 1950's, there were two options for music: the mass media and the local live venue. Discovery of new music was an undertaking, and one with no certainty of success. If you couldn't find a band, movie, or novel that resonated with you, that was simply the nature of the world in which you lived. But, we live in the age of limitless options, of micro-fame, and of the democratization of the means of production. Bands that would never have had the money to release an album thirty years ago now put out 15 tracks per month on MySpace. Some of the best writers in the world are accessible only through blogs. What you're looking for is out there, you just have to be willing to put in the work to find it. What you find will always be a lie. It will always serve a different need to for its creator than the need it satifies in you. But, the more options you have and the more honest expressions of intellect and emotion that are available to us, the smaller the lie becomes. Will Sheff is right: the fewer the lies, the better off we all are.

The Curious Case of Joe Budden  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

What if the movie were titled "The Curious Case of Joe Budden" instead of "The Curious Case of Benjamin Button?"


Gary Coleman could have found some work for the first portion of the movie.

The movie could have followed the curious arc of Joe Budden's career (inital great success, followed by...nothingness).

Jay-Z could have married Cate Blanchett.

Cate Blanchett could have been omitted from the movie and someone hotter cast in her stead (really, this could have happened regardless. No offense, Cate Blanchett fans, but she convincingly played a man in a movie last year).

Budden could have had beef with Dr. Dre and Run DMC at the retirement home.

There could have been a montage set to "Pump It Up" of Budden aging backwards.

This movie, in all likelihood, would not have been nominated for 13 Oscars.

...And we're back!  

Posted by S. Stills in


With new hats to boot. Now that inauguration is officially over, (me and LD had one last inaugural party* to go to last night), we can get back to the business of posting about the important issues that affect real Americans' lives day in, and day out.

But just to commemorate this historic week and our new President, I think it's best left to one of our generation's foremost poets and thinkers, whose remarks made this past weekend in D.C. really say what we all feel:


"I wanna thank two people: I wanna thank the muthafucka overseas that threw two shoes at George Bush, and I wanna thank the muthafuckas who helped they move they shit up out the White House – get it moving, bitch! My president is muthafucking black!"
-Young Jeezy


Muthafucking right, Snowman. Mutha. Fucking. Right.

Welcome to a new America, world.

* we aren't ones to brag, but it was pretty much the greatest party in the history of the universe.

Obama Hat Picture credit: Link

Vice President Joe Budden  

Posted by Top Sella in ,

Food for thought...What if Barack Obama picked Joe Budden as his vice president instead of Joe Biden?

The Veep would have snubbed Jay-Z's performance at the Inaugural Ball, a hangover from their toxic relationship at Def Jam.

Saigon would have showed up, dissing Budden during the swearing-in with some freestyle antics.

The inauguration would have been postponed four years, much like Budden's second album.

The VP would have beef with like everybody in the Senate.

Budden would totally have started rapping "Pump it Up" when it became obvious that that boring fucking poet was losing the crowd.

People would still be talking about Joe Budden.

About Us

Seven guys who refuse to act their age. Important opinions on unimportant topics. More useless knowledge than they know what to do with.

Writers
E.....wears ironic tshirts unironically.

Y.....wishes he still followed wrestling.  

LD....whatever he hits, he destroys.

N8....finally learned that the cake is a lie.

SN....cut his left ear off with a hacksaw.

Grimbil....is growin' and showin'

JC....is addicted to stimpaks.

Contact Us

We love hate mail! It's a conundrum!

geek.prospectus
_at_gmail.com

Subscribe Now!

Archives

Labels